Browse By

Advertisements

Resolved: The United States should promote the development of market rate housing in urban neighborhoods.

Need help taking your debate skills to the next level? Click here to visit my Debate Academy to get personal coaching, purchase briefs, and more. Let’s work together to make you the best.

Resolved: The United States should promote the development of market rate housing in urban neighborhoods.

Oof, what is it with these terrible topics? I don’t understand what people are thinking anymore. What is there even to debate here? So little research has been done, and available data is so limited, that the debates on this are going to devolve into emotion battles about which side the judge feels is right. On the bright side, you’ll probably learn things you didn’t know before, but the resolution is worded so poorly that all of that will probably be lost. But alas, it is what we are given, so let’s do the best we can.

Definitions

Market rate housing – This is housing that is build without rent restrictions. Often, in urban neighborhoods, rent restrictions will be put on housing construction. The owner can only rent it for so much. This has historically been one solution to creating affordable housing.

Urban Neighborhoods – The word “urban” here doesn’t necessarily mean within a big city. Rather, it refers to poor, often minority, neighborhoods within any greater metropolitan area. It will be important to define this properly to prevent bad debate.

The most important part of your definitions is going to be determining how we determine what the U.S. should do. The trouble here is that there isn’t a clear agent of action. The government can enact policies, sure, but the U.S. contains many more actors like housing developers and citizens. They are also relevant. Your framework will need to clearly define an agent of action and then explain how we determine what that agent of action should do. The easiest agent of action to talk about is the government, so that’s what we’ll focus on here.

Pro

1. Societal Welfare – The government’s entire purpose is to promote societal welfare. If it fails to do that, then what’s the point of having one? Market rate housing promotes welfare. Areas where there are market rate developments fare better economically than areas with rent controls. Additionally, market rate housing attracts developers to build more because they can more easily sent rents. Urban neighborhoods have severe housing shortages, and this will promote new construction to end those shortages.

2. Progress – How do we make things better than they are now? Market rate housing will help urban neighborhoods accelerate their development. A society is marked by how well it provides for the least advantaged members of its society, so the U.S. should promote market rate housing in the least advantaged neighborhoods.

Con

1. Market rate housing promotes poverty – Rent controls don’t just appear out of thin air. They appear because landlords charge exorbitant rents to exploit the citizens in an area, particularly in areas with housing shortages. Remarkably, there is no shortage of housing for people who have money. The shortage exists for those people who don’t. Instead, the government should invest in affordable housing initiatives. Developers aren’t attracted to urban neighborhoods anyway, and market rate housing won’t solve that. After all, not every urban neighborhood has rent controls, but new construction is still sparse.

2. Market Freedom – The U.S. government should not interrupt the free market. Let the market decide what rent should be and where development should occur. That will result in the best situation for everyone.

3. U.S. Constitution – This type of economic regulation is beyond the constitutionally permitted powers of the U.S. government. It is not an exercise necessary to regulate interstate commerce, and therefore, should not be permitted. It is a violation of property rights and economic freedom.

There you go. That’s a start at least. Good luck!
And don’t forget to visit the Academy if you want private coaching or to purchase briefs.

18 thoughts on “Resolved: The United States should promote the development of market rate housing in urban neighborhoods.”

  1. Mike Wazowski says:

    ur trash jus lik dis topik

  2. yasmin says:

    in the con, the 1st contention goings against the 2nd saying the market should be free should be in the pro case

    1. sxa255 says:

      The free market argument is contending that the government should not promote ANY housing, market rate or otherwise. It is actually not going against the con for that reason. A free market position does not work on the Pro because the government is still interfering.

  3. unablehippo says:

    what would be a good idea as a contention on pro that is not directly about the government but mainly about helping low income people.

    1. sxa255 says:

      So keep in mind that I don’t provide contentions on here, but frameworks. You shouldn’t ask yourself what your contention should be. You should start with the framework and work down from there. Both the frameworks I’ve provided for the Pro can have contentions about helping low income people.

  4. UnableHIppo's Answer says:

    I think a good idea would be social welfare

  5. UnableHIppo's Answer says:

    I think a good idea would be social welfare with the free market as one of the subpoints.

    1. unablehippo says:

      youtrash just like donald trump

  6. KoolKidzKlup says:

    Wow, stop insulting the UnableHippo’s answer like that. He’s richer, smarter, and cooler than you, unableHippo. Your garbage, even worse than Donald Trump

    1. niranjaan raaj ashok says:

      no u

  7. unablehippo says:

    When are you going to post the stuff for the new april topic: Resolved: The United Nations should grant India permanent membership on the Security Council.

  8. unablehippoa says:

    When are you going to post the stuff for the new april topic: Resolved: The United Nations should grant India permanent membership on the Security Council.

    1. sxa255 says:

      I will probably post it tomorrow

      1. unablehippo says:

        thankyou

  9. harleensidhu says:

    Everyone is trashing your paper on this debate topic and I’m not gonna lie, its pretty bad. But your page is super cute and I liked that little photo thing that the beginning. Hang in there!

    1. sxa255 says:

      Not sure what you’re talking about. I haven’t written a paper, nor have I seen anyone trashing the post. What do you think is so bad about it?

  10. ANGSTY TEEN says:

    Hey I procrastinated and I need to know if I have your real name or a pseudonym to quote you at “Rent controls don’t just appear out of thin air. They appear because landlords charge exorbitant rents to exploit the citizens in an area, particularly in areas with housing shortages. Remarkably, there is no shortage of housing for people who have money. The shortage exists for those people who don’t.” I can’t quote this as shatteringthelens because everyone knows that it’s a debate site and I am going to get rekt at state tomorrow morning (aka 6 hours) PLEASE SEND HELP

    1. sxa255 says:

      Lol, you can use my name if you want to. It’s on the site, but I really recommend against it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *